This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Reynolds, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Learning Styles: A Critique

Lancaster University, M.Reynolds{at}lancaster.ac.uk

The concept of `learning style' is virtually taken for granted in management development, in spite of considerable doubts about its validity from within cognitive psychology and education. The first part of this paper summarizes research that is critical of `learning styles', particularly in the form which predominates within management development and introduces the alternative concept of learning strategy, which is rarely encountered in this field. The second part of the paper develops a critique of learning style theory from a critical education perspective, raising even more significant concerns that in decontextualizing learning the concept of style may provide a discriminatory basis for dealing with difference in gender or race.

Management Learning, Vol. 28, No. 2, 115-133 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1350507697282002


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Gabriel and D. S. Griffiths International Learning Groups: Synergies and Dysfunctions Management Learning, November 1, 2008; 39(5): 503 - 518. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Valiente Are students using the 'wrong' style of learning?: A multicultural scrutiny for helping teachers to appreciate differences Active Learning in Higher Education, March 1, 2008; 9(1): 73 - 91. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. S. Griffiths, D. Winstanley, and Y. Gabriel Learning Shock: The Trauma of Return to Formal Learning Management Learning, September 1, 2005; 36(3): 275 - 297. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Duff The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (RASI) and its Use in Management Education Active Learning in Higher Education, March 1, 2004; 5(1): 56 - 72. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Contu, C. Grey, and A. ortenblad Against Learning Human Relations, August 1, 2003; 56(8): 931 - 952. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. G. L. Romme Learning Outcomes of Microworlds for Management Education Management Learning, March 1, 2003; 34(1): 51 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. E. C. Van Der Sluis and R. F. Poell Learning Opportunities and Learning Behavior: A Study among MBAs in their Early Career Stage Management Learning, September 1, 2002; 33(3): 291 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Sadler-Smith A Reply to Reynolds's Critique of Learning Style Management Learning, September 1, 2001; 32(3): 291 - 304. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Sadler-Smith, C. W. Allinson, and J. Hayes Learning Preferences and Cognitive Style: Some Implications for Continuing Professional Development Management Learning, June 1, 2000; 31(2): 239 - 256. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Reynolds Critical Reflection and Management Education: Rehabilitating Less Hierarchical Approaches Journal of Management Education, October 1, 1999; 23(5): 537 - 553. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Reynolds Reflection and Critical Reflection in Management Learning Management Learning, June 1, 1998; 29(2): 183 - 200. [Abstract]