Management Learning

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holman, D.
Right arrow Articles by Thorpe, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Management Learning, Vol. 28, No. 2, 135-148 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1350507697282003
© 1997 SAGE Publications

Rethinking Kolb's Theory of Experiential Learning in Management Education

The Contribution of Social Constructionism and Activity Theory

David Holman

Sheffield University

Karel Pavlica

Manchester Metropolitan University

Richard Thorpe

Manchester Metropolitan University

This article seeks to critically evaluate Kolb's theory of experiential learning from social constructionist and activity theory perspectives. It is suggested that while experiential learning theory has been extremely influential and useful in management education it is rarely seen as problematic. The article goes on to argue that Kolb's experiential learning theory can be placed within the cognitive psychological tradition; a tradition that overlooks or mechanically explains the social, historical and cultural aspects of self, thinking and action. Activity theory is then described (but also drawing on more recent social constructionist perspectives) and offered as an alternative way of understanding these three aspects. Using this approach, experiential learning theory is reconceptualized with particular reference to the learning cycle and managerial identity. It is concluded that learning can be viewed as an argumentative and rhetorical process in which the manager acts as a practical author.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management LearningHome page
L. Pittaway and J. Cope
Simulating Entrepreneurial Learning: Integrating Experiential and Collaborative Approaches to Learning
Management Learning, April 1, 2007; 38(2): 211 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Small Business JournalHome page
R. Thorpe, J. Gold, R. Holt, and J. Clarke
Immaturity: The Constraining of Entrepreneurship
International Small Business Journal, June 1, 2006; 24(3): 232 - 250.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
C. Ramsey
Narrative: From Learning in Reflection to Learning in Performance
Management Learning, June 1, 2005; 36(2): 219 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
L. E. C. Van Der Sluis and R. F. Poell
Learning Opportunities and Learning Behavior: A Study among MBAs in their Early Career Stage
Management Learning, September 1, 2002; 33(3): 291 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
A. L. Cunliffe
Reflexive Dialogical Practice in Management Learning
Management Learning, March 1, 2002; 33(1): 35 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
G. Hollinshead and S. Michailova
Blockbusters or Bridge-Builders? The Role of Western Trainers in Developing New Entrepreneurialism in Eastern Europe
Management Learning, December 1, 2001; 32(4): 419 - 436.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
E. Sadler-Smith
A Reply to Reynolds's Critique of Learning Style
Management Learning, September 1, 2001; 32(3): 291 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
J. A. Raelin
Public Reflection as the Basis of Learning
Management Learning, March 1, 2001; 32(1): 11 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
D. Holman
Contemporary Models of Management Education in the UK
Management Learning, June 1, 2000; 31(2): 197 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
S. Down
(Yet) Another Side of HRM?
Organization, August 1, 1999; 6(3): 543 - 558.
[PDF]