|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Management Learning, Vol. 28, No. 2,
135-148 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1350507697282003
© 1997 SAGE Publications
Rethinking Kolb's Theory of Experiential Learning in Management Education
The Contribution of Social Constructionism and Activity Theory
David Holman
Sheffield University
Karel Pavlica
Manchester Metropolitan University
Richard Thorpe
Manchester Metropolitan University
This article seeks to critically evaluate Kolb's theory of experiential learning from social constructionist and activity theory perspectives. It is suggested that while experiential learning theory has been extremely influential and useful in management education it is rarely seen as problematic. The article goes on to argue that Kolb's experiential learning theory can be placed within the cognitive psychological tradition; a tradition that overlooks or mechanically explains the social, historical and cultural aspects of self, thinking and action. Activity theory is then described (but also drawing on more recent social constructionist perspectives) and offered as an alternative way of understanding these three aspects. Using this approach, experiential learning theory is reconceptualized with particular reference to the learning cycle and managerial identity. It is concluded that learning can be viewed as an argumentative and rhetorical process in which the manager acts as a practical author.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Pittaway and J. Cope
Simulating Entrepreneurial Learning: Integrating Experiential and Collaborative Approaches to Learning
Management Learning,
April 1, 2007;
38(2):
211 - 233.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Thorpe, J. Gold, R. Holt, and J. Clarke
Immaturity: The Constraining of Entrepreneurship
International Small Business Journal,
June 1, 2006;
24(3):
232 - 250.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Ramsey
Narrative: From Learning in Reflection to Learning in Performance
Management Learning,
June 1, 2005;
36(2):
219 - 235.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. C. Van Der Sluis and R. F. Poell
Learning Opportunities and Learning Behavior: A Study among MBAs in their Early Career Stage
Management Learning,
September 1, 2002;
33(3):
291 - 311.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Cunliffe
Reflexive Dialogical Practice in Management Learning
Management Learning,
March 1, 2002;
33(1):
35 - 61.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Hollinshead and S. Michailova
Blockbusters or Bridge-Builders? The Role of Western Trainers in Developing New Entrepreneurialism in Eastern Europe
Management Learning,
December 1, 2001;
32(4):
419 - 436.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Sadler-Smith
A Reply to Reynolds's Critique of Learning Style
Management Learning,
September 1, 2001;
32(3):
291 - 304.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Raelin
Public Reflection as the Basis of Learning
Management Learning,
March 1, 2001;
32(1):
11 - 30.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Holman
Contemporary Models of Management Education in the UK
Management Learning,
June 1, 2000;
31(2):
197 - 217.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Down
(Yet) Another Side of HRM?
Organization,
August 1, 1999;
6(3):
543 - 558.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|