This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sinclair, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The MBA through Women's Eyes

Learning and Pedagogy in Management Education

University of Melbourne, a.sinclair{at}mbs.unimelb.edu.au

Disquiet about the fitness and future of management education prompts this exploratory study of the MBA experience from women's points of view. Interviews with 16 women MBAs yield findings that are broadly consistent with research suggesting that women prefer to learn and be taught in ways which depart from traditional MBA approaches. In particular, interviewees identified four sources of tension in their educational experience: centralization versus decentralization of authority in the classroom; defenses against admissions of uncertainty and ignorance; learning by looking outwards or inwards; and knowing by analytical replication versus imaginative and emotional engagement. Several implications for management education are drawn. Knowledge that is delivered through traditional pedagogues is accepted as legitimate, while understanding gained through alternative processes is viewed as inferior or lower-order. Some learning strategies are devalued, particularly those women have often preferred. Both men and women suffer from the resulting narrow array of learning opportunities. Secondly, this research helps explain why women teachers, when judged against traditional norms of equating dominance with authority, are often valued less. It is concluded that institutional experimentation with a wider range of learning and pedagogical strategies would better equip managers when working with diverse contemporary workforces, and would also help them build wider repertoires for learning and understanding.

Management Learning, Vol. 28, No. 3, 313-330 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1350507697283004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Brocklehurst, A. Sturdy, D. Winstanley, and M. Driver Introduction: Whither the MBA? Factions, Fault Lines and the Future Management Learning, September 1, 2007; 38(4): 379 - 388. [PDF]

				A. Sturdy The Adoption of Management Ideas and Practices: Theoretical Perspectives and Possibilities Management Learning, June 1, 2004; 35(2): 155 - 179. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Hagen, S. Miller, and M. Johnson The `Disruptive Consequences' of Introducing a Critical Management Perspective onto an MBA Programme: The Lecturers' View Management Learning, June 1, 2003; 34(2): 241 - 257. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Currie and D. Knights Reflecting on a Critical Pedagogy in MBA Education Management Learning, March 1, 2003; 34(1): 27 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Catterall, P. Maclaran, and L. Stevens Critical Reflection in the Marketing Curriculum Journal of Marketing Education, December 1, 2002; 24(3): 184 - 192. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Reynolds Bright Lights and the Pastoral Idyll: Ideas of Community Underlying Management Education Methodologies Management Learning, March 1, 2000; 31(1): 67 - 81. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Sinclair Teaching Managers about Masculinities: Are You Kidding? Management Learning, March 1, 2000; 31(1): 83 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF]