Management Learning

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sadler-Smith, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Management Learning, Vol. 32, No. 3, 291-304 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1350507601323001

A Reply to Reynolds's Critique of Learning Style

Eugene Sadler-Smith

University of Plymouth Business School, UK, eugene.sadler-smith{at}pbs.plym.ac.uk

In 1997 Reynolds presented a critique of learning styles in which he lamented the readiness of practitioners to embrace instruments such as the Learning Styles Questionnaire and argued for learning styles and other forms of labelling to be discontinued. It is the contention of this reply that Reynolds may have conflated the concepts of learning styles, learning strategies and cognitive style. While learning style may be a term rendered somewhat meaningless and potentially redundant by over-usage and a weak theoretical base, the notions of cognitive style (for which there is growing empirical and physiological evidence) and learning strategy are valid concepts which managerial learning should incorporate into its pedagogy.

Key Words: cognitive style • human resource development • learning preferences • learning strategies • learning style • management development


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human Resource Development ReviewHome page
M. G. M. C. Berings, R. F. Poell, and P. R.-J. Simons
Conceptualizing On-the-Job Learning Styles
Human Resource Development Review, December 1, 2005; 4(4): 373 - 400.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
D. S. Griffiths, D. Winstanley, and Y. Gabriel
Learning Shock: The Trauma of Return to Formal Learning
Management Learning, September 1, 2005; 36(3): 275 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
M. Sinclair and N. M. Ashkanasy
Intuition: Myth or a Decision-making Tool?
Management Learning, September 1, 2005; 36(3): 353 - 370.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
A. G. L. Romme
Learning Outcomes of Microworlds for Management Education
Management Learning, March 1, 2003; 34(1): 51 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]