Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Management Learning
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Representations of the Intellectual

Insights from Gramsci on Management Education

Carole Elliott

Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, c.j.elliott{at}lancaster.ac.uk

This article explores the contemporary relationship between management educators and practitioners, as expressed in the Critical Management Studies (CMS) literature, in the light of Gramsci’s writings on the formation and roles of intellectuals within society. His conception of intellectuals as being of two types—organic and traditional—is used as a heuristic to explore the claims made by critical management studies for an emancipatory agenda. Using Gramsci’s writings as a point of departure I stake out a position that starts to reconsider how management educators have come to acquire their perceived position of governance over what passes as management knowledge. I suggest that to do this we need to consider management education’s socio-cultural position. I adopt Gramsci’s notion of the ‘system of relations’ as a way to focus on the relationships between management education, management educators, and management practitioners. The article suggests that CMS needs to pay attention to the pedagogical processes of management education as much as to its content. I conclude that research that observes what are currently perceived as ‘critical’ and ‘non-critical’ management education classrooms must take place. Until this occurs, CMS’s claims for an emancipatory agenda must remain muted.

Key Words: critical management studies • educators • Gramsci • organic intellectuals • practitioners

Management Learning, Vol. 34, No. 4, 411-427 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1350507603035354


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing TheoryHome page
S. Bohm and V. Brei
Marketing the hegemony of development: of pulp fictions and green deserts
Marketing Theory, December 1, 2008; 8(4): 339 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
A. Spicer and S. Bohm
Moving Management: Theorizing Struggles against the Hegemony of Management
Organization Studies, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 1667 - 1698.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
S. Harney
Socialization and the Business School
Management Learning, April 1, 2007; 38(2): 139 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]