Management Learning

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Gabriel, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Management Learning, Vol. 36, No. 3, 275-297 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1350507605055347

Learning Shock

The Trauma of Return to Formal Learning

Dorothy S. Griffiths

Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London, UK

Diana Winstanley

Kingston Business School, Kingston University, UK

Yiannis Gabriel

Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London, UK, y.Gabriel{at}imperial.ac.uk

This article develops a theory for a phenomenon we have termed ‘learning shock’. This refers to experiences of acute frustration, confusion and anxiety experienced by some students, who find themselves exposed to unfamiliar learning and teaching methods, bombarded by unexpected and disorienting cues, and subjected to ambiguous and conflicting expectations. The article examines the incidence of learning shock among a group of full-time students studying towards a Masters in Business Administration and aims to identify some of the causes of learning shock as well as some of its principal manifestations. It further examines some of the coping strategies used by these students and the relative effectiveness of such strategies. Our findings suggest that one of the foremost factors contributing to learning shock can be the experience of working and learning as part of a multi-cultural syndicate group, something that is a regular feature of MBA degrees. We examine some of the reasons why such syndicate groups can become dysfunctional to learning. The article concludes with some recommendations on the management of learning shock.

Key Words: coping • cross-cultural • culture shock • international students • syndicate learning


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management LearningHome page
S. Gagnon
Compelling Identity: Selves and Insecurity in Global, Corporate Management Development
Management Learning, September 1, 2008; 39(4): 375 - 391.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
C. Elliott
Emancipating Assessment: Assessment Assumptions and Critical Alternatives in an Experience-based Programme
Management Learning, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 271 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Studies in International EducationHome page
E. Kingston and H. Forland
Bridging the Gap in Expectations Between International Students and Academic Staff
Journal of Studies in International Education, June 1, 2008; 12(2): 204 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
G. Currie
`Beyond Our Imagination': The Voice of International Students on the MBA
Management Learning, November 1, 2007; 38(5): 539 - 556.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
K. Legge, B. Sullivan-Taylor, and D. Wilson
Management Learning and the Corporate MBA: Situated or Individual?
Management Learning, September 1, 2007; 38(4): 440 - 457.
[Abstract] [PDF]