Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Management Learning
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Enberg, C.
Right arrow Articles by Tell, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Exploring the Dynamics of Knowledge Integration

Acting and Interacting in Project Teams

Cecilia Enberg

Linköping University, Sweden, cecilia.enberg{at}eki.liu.se

Lars Lindkvist

Linköping University, Sweden, larli{at}eki.liu.se

Fredrik Tell

Linköping University, Sweden, frete{at}eki.liu.se

This article investigates knowledge integration in product development projects. While much previous literature draws attention to the need for clearly specified goals, extensive knowledge sharing and close face-to-face interaction for activity and knowledge integration, alternative explanations are offered. The findings highlight the integrative capacity of individuals’ experience and tacit foreknowledge of the stacker artefact, as well as the complementary role of meetings and ad hoc problem solving. The article proposes an iterative model of the individual/collective dynamics involved and calls attention to its economizing potential. More generally, it provides an example of how the issue of knowledge integration may be reformulated into a dynamic perspective, recognizing the intergenerational learning benefits that accrue. The conclusions extend the argument of Zollo and Winter by showing how different task-related learning mechanisms may be combined and obtain their integrative capacity within an iterative process.

Key Words: knowledge integration • learning • project • tacit knowledge • teamwork

Management Learning, Vol. 37, No. 2, 143-165 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1350507606063440


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human Resource Development ReviewHome page
E. Du Chatenier, J. A.A.M. Verstegen, H. J.A. Biemans, M. Mulder, and O. Omta
The Challenges of Collaborative Knowledge Creation in Open Innovation Teams
Human Resource Development Review, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 350 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
F. Chiocchio and H. Essiembre
Cohesion and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review of Disparities Between Project Teams, Production Teams, and Service Teams
Small Group Research, August 1, 2009; 40(4): 382 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]