Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Management Learning
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bridgman, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reconstituting Relevance

Exploring Possibilities for Management Educators' Critical Engagement with the Public

Todd Bridgman

Victoria Management School, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, todd.bridgman{at}vuw.ac.nz

This article considers the possibilities of, and threats to, the performance of a critical public role by business school faculty, based on an empirical study of UK research-led business schools. Its reference point is a recent debate about the `relevance' of management education to management practice—a debate which has become polarized around nodal points of `critical' and `engaged' with the implication that engagement with external constituencies requires the suspension of critique and conversely, that critique of received wisdom is of little relevance to stakeholders. The notion of a critical engagement with the public asserts that business schools can serve a valuable democratic function as scrutinizers of organizational activity. This role is largely marginalized in prevailing conceptions of an increasingly commercialized business school, but the empirical study suggests there is some cause for optimism. The demonstration of `relevance' does not have to involve the pursuit of a narrow commercialization agenda where the business school propagates a strictly managerialist view of the world.

Key Words: Key Words: commodification • critical management studies • critical thinking • management education • public role

Management Learning, Vol. 38, No. 4, 425-439 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1350507607080575


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management LearningHome page
M. Sliwa and G. Cairns
Towards a Critical Pedagogy of International Business: The Application of Phronesis
Management Learning, July 1, 2009; 40(3): 227 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
S. Woolgar, C. Coopmans, and D. Neyland
Does STS Mean Business?
Organization, January 1, 2009; 16(1): 5 - 30.
[PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
S. A. Cole
A Cautionary Tale About Cautionary Tales About Intervention
Organization, January 1, 2009; 16(1): 121 - 141.
[Abstract] [PDF]