Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Management Learning
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turnbull James, K.
Right arrow Articles by Denyer, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Historical Roots and Future Directions: New Challenges for Management Learning

Kim Turnbull James

Cranfield University, UK, k.james{at}cranfield.ac.uk

David Denyer

Cranfield University, UK, david.denyer{at}cranfield.ac.uk

This article explores the development of Management Learning from nascent publication for a trade association focusing on applied research to an esteemed international and learned journal. Since the mid 1970s editors and contributors have dedicated themselves to the publication of scholarly, theoretical and critical approaches. They have achieved considerable success. On the whole a much more scholarly approach has been developed in understanding management learning and has helped to legitimize it as an acceptable and appropriate field of study. Conversely there have been costs associated with this mission. We reveal a relative decline of practical, user led and collaborative research papers and contributions directly addressing the concerns of executive education and development, particularly in terms of design, delivery and evaluation. The article concludes with a plea for rigorous, scholarly contributions that are also contextual and accessible to practitioners.

Key Words: executive development • management education • practice relevance

Management Learning, Vol. 40, No. 4, 363-370 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1350507609335844


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?