|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Reconstituting RelevanceExploring Possibilities for Management Educators' Critical Engagement with the Public
Todd Bridgman
Victoria Management School, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, todd.bridgman{at}vuw.ac.nz
This article considers the possibilities of, and threats to, the performance of a critical public role by business school faculty, based on an empirical study of UK research-led business schools. Its reference point is a recent debate about the `relevance' of management education to management practice—a debate which has become polarized around nodal points of `critical' and `engaged' with the implication that engagement with external constituencies requires the suspension of critique and conversely, that critique of received wisdom is of little relevance to stakeholders. The notion of a critical engagement with the public asserts that business schools can serve a valuable democratic function as scrutinizers of organizational activity. This role is largely marginalized in prevailing conceptions of an increasingly commercialized business school, but the empirical study suggests there is some cause for optimism. The demonstration of `relevance' does not have to involve the pursuit of a narrow commercialization agenda where the business school propagates a strictly managerialist view of the world.
Key Words: Key Words: commodification critical management studies critical thinking management education public role
References
- Brunner, K.-M., Hofbauer, J. and Prabitz, G. (2000) `Intellectual Discourse in the Academy and Society: Interpretation, Legitimation and the Rise of Management Talk', in R. Brown and Y. Schubert (eds) Knowledge and Power in Higher Education: A Reader, pp. 70—87. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Davies, H. (2006) `LSE Report on ID Cards Cost', The Times, 2 July 2006. Available at http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,59-1677135,00.html. Accessed 20 February 2006.
- Du Gay, P. and Salaman, G. (1992) `The Cult[ure] of the Customer', Journal of Management Studies 29(5): 615—33.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Furedi, F. (2001) `An Intellectual Vacuum', The Times Higher Educational Supplement. 5 October 2001.
- Ghoshal, S. (2005) `Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices', Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1): 75—91.[Web of Science]
- Gibbons, M., Limoges, L., Nowotny, H., Schwartman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
- Grey, C. (2001) `Re-imagining Relevance: A Response to Starkey and Madan', British Journal of Management 12(Special Issue): 27—32.[CrossRef]
- Grey, C. and Willmott, H. (2002) `Contexts of CMS', Organization 9(3): 411—18.[Free Full Text]
- Guardian (2005) `Simon Davies: In a Spin', 5 July 2005. Available from: http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/profile/story/0,11109,1521127,00.html. Accessed 20 February 2006.
- Hackett, G. (2006) `I'm the New Kelly, Says ID Card Critic', The Sunday Times, 12 February 2006. Available at http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2036535,00.html. Accessed 20 February 2006.
- Jacoby, R. (1987) The Last Intellectuals: American Culture in the Age of Academe. New York: Basic Books.
- Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
- Lambert, R. (2003) Lambert Review of Business—University Collaboration. London: HM Treasury.
- London School of Economics and Political Science (2005) The Identity Project: An Assessment of the UK Identity Cards Bill and Its Implications. Available at http://is2.lse.ac.uk/IDcard/identityreport.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2006.
- London School of Economics and Political Science (2006) The Identity Project: Research Status Report. Available at http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idcard/statusreport.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2006.
- Mintzberg, H. (2004) Managers Not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. London: FT Prentice Hall.
- Mir, R. and Mir, A. ( 2002) `The Organizational Imagination: From Paradigm Wars to Praxis', Organizational Research Methods 5(1): 105—25.[Abstract]
- Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A. and Duran, X. (2002) Measuring Third Stream Activities: Final Report to the Russell Group of Universities. University of Sussex: Science and Technology Policy Research.
- Parker, M. (2002) Against Management. Cambridge: Polity.
- Pfeffer, J. and Fong, C. (2002) `The End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye', Academy of Management Learning and Education 1(1): 78—95.
- Starkey, K. and Madan, P. (2001) `Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research', British Journal of Management 12(Special Issue): S3—S26.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Tasker, M. and Packham, D. (1990) `Freedom, Funding and the Future of the Universities ', Studies in Higher Education 15(2): 181—95.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Weick, K. (2001) `Gapping the Relevance Bridge: Fashions Meet Fundamentals in Management Research', British Journal of Management 12(Special Issue): S71—S75.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Willmott, H. (2005) `Theorizing Contemporary Control: Some Post-structuralist Responses to Some Critical Realist Questions', Organization 12(5): 747—80.[Abstract]
Management Learning, Vol. 38, No. 4,
425-439 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1350507607080575

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sliwa and G. Cairns
Towards a Critical Pedagogy of International Business: The Application of Phronesis
Management Learning,
July 1, 2009;
40(3):
227 - 240.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Woolgar, C. Coopmans, and D. Neyland
Does STS Mean Business?
Organization,
January 1, 2009;
16(1):
5 - 30.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Cole
A Cautionary Tale About Cautionary Tales About Intervention
Organization,
January 1, 2009;
16(1):
121 - 141.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|