This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Swan, J. Articles by Robertson, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Construction of `Communities of Practice' in the Management of Innovation

University of Warwick, UK, J.A.Swan{at}warwick.ac.uk

Harry Scarbrough

University of Warwick, UK, Harry.Scarbrough{at}wbs.ac.uk

Maxine Robertson

University of Warwick, UK, Maxine.Robertson{at}wbs.ac.uk

Communities of practice have been identified as playing a critical role in the promotion of learning and innovation in organizations. Yet, while innovation may be facilitated within communities of practice, radical innovations frequently occur at the interstices across communities. Here, the performative advantages of communities of practice are less clear. Moreover, while it has been suggested that managers play a critical role in constructing, aligning or supporting communities of practice, there is little empirical evidence for these assertions. This article contributes to these debates on the construction of communities of practice and their role in the innovation process. It does this through a case study of a radical innovation for the treatment of prostate cancer. The case focuses on Medico-the company that manufactured a product for the new treatment-and explores attempts by managers to construct a new `community of practice' as a vehicle for innovation. While the case highlights attempts by managers to construct communities as `social objects', it also underlines the shift in management strategies and practices associated with such a construction. Faced with powerful professions, and limited organizational support, managers employed a strategy centred on constructing a community focused on the disease (rather than the product) using `community of practice' as a rhetorical device to enrol key professionals and to mobilize and legitimize changes in work practice. Thus community building reflected managers' lack of power to intensify innovation by other means.

Key Words: communities of practice • innovation • knowledge • networks of practice • power

Management Learning, Vol. 33, No. 4, 477-496 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1350507602334005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Hara, P. Shachaf, and S. Stoerger Online communities of practice typology revisited Journal of Information Science, December 1, 2009; 35(6): 740 - 757. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Turnbull James and D. Denyer Historical Roots and Future Directions: New Challenges for Management Learning Management Learning, September 1, 2009; 40(4): 363 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. F. L. Hong and F. K. H. O Conflicting Identities and Power Between Communities of Practice: The Case of IT Outsourcing Management Learning, July 1, 2009; 40(3): 311 - 326. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Gherardi Introduction: The Critical Power of the `Practice Lens' Management Learning, April 1, 2009; 40(2): 115 - 128. [PDF]

				K.-P. Schulz Shared Knowledge and Understandings in Organizations: Its Development and Impact in Organizational Learning Processes Management Learning, September 1, 2008; 39(4): 457 - 473. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Fenwick Understanding Relations of Individual--Collective Learning in Work: A Review of Research Management Learning, July 1, 2008; 39(3): 227 - 243. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Allan Time to Learn?: E-learners' Experiences of Time in Virtual Learning Communities Management Learning, November 1, 2007; 38(5): 557 - 572. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Mooradian, B. Renzl, and K. Matzler Who Trusts? Personality, Trust and Knowledge Sharing Management Learning, December 1, 2006; 37(4): 523 - 540. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Fenwick Toward Enriched Conceptions of Work Learning: Participation, Expansion, and Translation Among Individuals With/In Activity Human Resource Development Review, September 1, 2006; 5(3): 285 - 302. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Clarke and D. Butcher Reconciling Hierarchy and Democracy: The Value of Management Learning Management Learning, September 1, 2006; 37(3): 313 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. Jones Developing Absorptive Capacity in Mature Organizations: The Change Agent's Role Management Learning, September 1, 2006; 37(3): 355 - 376. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. P. Lopez, J. M. M. Peon, and C. J. V. Ordas Human Resource Management as a Determining Factor in Organizational Learning Management Learning, June 1, 2006; 37(2): 215 - 239. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Grabher and O. Ibert Bad company? The ambiguity of personal knowledge networks J. Econ. Geogr., June 1, 2006; 6(3): 251 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Cox What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works Journal of Information Science, December 1, 2005; 31(6): 527 - 540. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Swan and H. Scarbrough The politics of networked innovation Human Relations, July 1, 2005; 58(7): 913 - 943. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Attwater and C. Derry Engaging communities of practice for risk communication in the Hawkesbury Water Recycling Scheme Action Research, June 1, 2005; 3(2): 193 - 209. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Sturdy The Adoption of Management Ideas and Practices: Theoretical Perspectives and Possibilities Management Learning, June 1, 2004; 35(2): 155 - 179. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Grabher Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks?: Communality, Sociality, and Connectivity in Project Ecologies European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 2004; 11(2): 103 - 123. [Abstract] [PDF]